Batfort

Style reveals substance

Category: Rhetoric & Aesthetics (page 3 of 7)

Video of the week: body language edition

It’s Friday, I’m drinking a Gin Pellegrino, and it’s time to post an image of the week.

I’m tempted to post the image of Trump sitting in Winston Churchill’s chair, but really any of the photos of Trump would be good this week.

However, another notable event happened in the form of Peter Strzok’s Congressional hearing. And if you took the time to view it in any form, you would have seen some…interesting…body language from him.

Fortunately for us, we have Mandy at Bombard’s Body Language to interpret. I particularly liked her video on Strzok. It covers not only him, but the FBI lawyer and some of the power squabbles amongst the congressmen.

Direct link

What struck me about Strzok’s body language is how much of his energy is sitting right behind his eyes, really forward in his head. He’s probably stressed out, and fully engaged, and trying to remember all of what the FBI has told him to lie about, but it’s a really weird look. He feels imbalanced somehow, like he’s only focused outwardly and not internally at all, like a normal person. Usually we’re somewhat balanced between inner and outer perception.

Anyway, this observation is what really caught my attention. Bombard began talking about the roles that the different congressmen were playing as they jockeyed for power.

“If you took out all of the crazy people then there wouldn’t be any crazy people.” No, that is not true. In any group, no matter the size, you’re going to have a leader, you’re going to have an enforcer, you’re going to have a believer, you’re going to have a clown, you’re going to have an idiot, and you’re going to have a crazy person. No matter what the size. You could take all those people out who stand out [in the crowd], and another leader would arise, another enforcer would arise, another idiot would arise, and so on. The only reason that they all don’t rise is because those with stronger minds suppress those who don’t have the strong minds.

This is why it’s important to have a strong mind–and to show it.

 

Image of the Week: Meme Parade

Debunked or not, this magazine cover will hover around our minds for quite some time.

Today I compiled a bunch of my favorite meme variants. The best of these are yet to come, I’m sure.

PS. It’s my 400th post today!

Image of the Week: Showdown

It’s obvious, right? More like image of the year.


Perfectly poised, yet crackling with energy.

Full of personality, yet timeless.

It looks art directed. Maybe it was.

Regardless, this photo speaks.

Image of the week: Order vs. Chaos

It’s funny, I started doing “Image of the Week” so I could have a rest day from writing without actually taking a day off. Now I’m actually more inspired and motivated to write that coming up with pictures is sometimes more difficult than I anticipated.

Fortunately, this week, Wrath of Gnon came through as ever. Order vs. chaos, city planning style.

I can’t stop staring at the organic version; the centrally planned houses make my skin crawl.

Wrath’s dessications of modern architecture are fantastic, but his demonstration of how architecture and city planning can be organic and human-centered is absolutely mind blowing.

Many of the modern diseases that we face (including my own) are the effects of overcentralization, of too much order with too little wisdom, of failure to understand tail risks.

(Basically everyone needs to read more Taleb.)

Sometimes it can be easy to overreact. “Burn it all, let’s make the jungle our home.” Sometimes I think I want that – but then I consider how difficult such a life would be.

Perhaps a better way is to realize that we cannot centrally plan civilization, and to figure out how to let natural, organic growth guide our technological sophistication.

It is difficult to visualize what that could look like – but Wrath provides examples. (Which usually happen to be very, very old but very, very beautiful. Naturally.)

I’ve been in a very pessimistic mood this week, but perhaps the future holds more promise than it seems.

Trickle down design trends

This is how I know I’m getting older: I have now watched a graphic design style slide from the indie to the cool kids to the normies.

Obviously this has happened many times in history, but it was a notable moment in my own history when I stood in line at the co-op and thought to myself, That’s strange, I’ve seen that design before.

But enough of a weirdo generalist introduction. Let’s talk about magazines.

Taste of Home. It’s not a sexy magazine, or something that’s after the hot new trend. It’s a solid magazine for solid people. I think the appeal in the grocery store checkout is for moms who don’t want to think up what to cook for dinner. It’s a magazine that has a real purpose, but not much excitement.

It used to look like this:

Now that I’m learning more about copywriting and sales letters, this magazine looks like a magazine-sized visual sales letter. Bright colors, enticing taglines, the number of things you’ll find inside that is inevitably a lie (even Vogue does this). Just trying to sell more copies at the checkout, ma’am.

The design reminds me of the blocky titles of the 90s but updated with the “we can never capitalize a word, ever” attitude from the early 2000s.

Ok, but here’s the thing. Now Taste of Home looks like this:

The title has morphed into a compact logo and the lines are much cleaner. Instead of a tableaux of food and color, we have one featured dish on a plain background. The type is simple (although not simple enough imo) and even has a hint (but not too much!!1) of a handwritten feel.

Now where have I seen this magazine cover before?

Hmm.

Hmmmmmmmm.

I trust you can spot the visual similarities. This particular issue is from 2008, around the time of BA’s design update. I was a subscriber at the time, and the teardrop motif was big for a while until they started phasing in handwriting.

Points to Taste of Home for skipping directly to the handwriting trend, although it doesn’t look like there’s any actual handwriting on that cover.

I really liked this era of BA. The magazine was clean and fun, they used some visual storytelling techniques as a result of the clean design, and there were really good ideas for recipes and parties. Part of me wishes I hadn’t unsubscribed, but I moved a couple times and then I started eating only meat. No need for recipes that involve vegetables, so it wasn’t a priority.

So imagine my surprise when I found a BA at my local co-op the other day, looking like this:

(Actually, wait, first I should tell you that I was big into indie and alt magazines for a while. There’s a great local cigar shop in Portland that stocks magazines from all over the world. That’s why I recognized these design elements.)

Look at this. It’s like Kinfolk (the food) mated with The Gentlewoman (the design). Blocky type. Heavy underlines. Lots of framing devices. Negative space. Freeform typesetting. The only thing missing is Millennial Pink ™. Did I mention negative space?

Like literally this same cover was on the newstand. No taglines. No promises. No nothing. I’m interested to see how that works out. Maybe some simplicity is called for now that the expected magazine is gasping its last breath.

(After a while, I made myself stop buying magazines because I felt like the content/money ratio wasn’t good enough. I can get better facts, narrative, and motivation from the internet, although I do miss the glossy pictures that I could tear out and put on my walls.)

We shall end with my favorite edition of The Gentlewoman, featuring the ever-awesome Angela Lansbury wearing the ever-problematic Terry Richardson’s glasses. This is the one with the blocky type, the framing, and – yes – the pink.

The Gentlewoman is one of those magazines that reacts against the “fast/cheap/short” model of magazine journalism by doing long-form interviews with badass ladies and lots of minimalist-traditional fashion. Always a little too rich for my blood, but I appreciated how they talked to actual real women who work for a living. It was the “cool” fashion magazine, the kind that eventually make their way into Anthropologie stores because of their good aesthetics.

Is The Gentlewoman in danger of losing its spot at the top of the design food chain? BA is nipping at its heels.

My instinct says that there’s a new offroad thinking-woman’s fashion magazine in town, but I don’t know what it is.

If you have any idea of what that might be, please let me know.

Image of the week: It’s bad

There are 2 types of people in the world….

 

It’s funny, this image stood out to me today in spite of the fact that it had very little to do with my own experience of reality this week. Most of my time was spent travelling and visiting old friends. But sometimes touching base with people you haven’t seen in a while allows you to see the drift that has occurred between two viewpoints.

I have drifted ever rightward over the years, and friends of mine have listed left. Or even stayed the same. But it’s easier to see after some time away, like how you need to put a piece of writing out of your mind for a while to get the most out of self-editing.

And honestly, as “alarming” as this graphic seems to be at first – is it really such a bad thing? Pew seems to be conflating Democrat with liberal and Republican with conservative. It would make sense that, as it becomes clear that Democrat and Republican are really two sides of the same coin, that actual true differences might appear between the left and the right (instead of a pile of bi-factional globalist mush).

On the other hand, maybe we can’t get along after all.

Image of the Week: Everything is appalling edition

I am appalled. I will continue being appalled. This week has reveled some truly horrific behavior. You’d think by now I would understand that most of the time humans are fallen, cowardly, and stupid.

Despite this meme’s insistence on conflating the “alt-rieich” branch of the alt-right with the rest of us (that’s okay, pretty much everyone does), it’s pretty ding dang dong correct.

I lost interest in that faction of the alt-right when most of its podcast hosts blithely declared that they would be democrats if we lived in an all-white society. Basically they wanted to live in pre-migration Sweden. Let’s ignore the fact that the people in pre-migration Sweden were the ones who let in the migrants.

Many of these same people insist on reacting like emotional teenage girls when they’re criticized by anyone on the actual right.

And then, of course, the alt-right’s favorite candidate for congress doxxed one of the most influential meme figures of the Great Meme Wars (RIP Ricky Vaughn).

It’s weeks like these that we’re reminded that there’s left and fake-right in the mainstream of every movement. Just like the democrats and republicans are really two different flavors of the same ruling party, you got your communists and your neo-nazi flavors of the “new right.”

And then there are the rest of us who actually believe in individual liberty, and with it, responsibility.

Most people don’t understand this. It’s why (I believe) that the voting franchise was so limited at first.

There is a very small minority of people who care about doing things right. The rest just go through the motions.

Appreciation post: /pol/

Little did I–or any of us–know that the what I used to call the “armpit of the internet” would become a driving force in truth.

Back in the day, when I was first exploring the internet thanks to high-speed connections in my college dorm, I discovered the delightful world of Encyclopedia Dramatica. In retrospect, it was just a giant wiki for jokes and memes from the chans. It’s probably overrun with malware and anime girls at this point.

Let’s be real: I liked it mostly because it was really, really naughty. And while I really enjoyed the writeups, I instinctively knew that I wouldn’t be able to handle the source material directly. (I was a very sensitive child.)

So I kept my distance, but I always appreciated that most of the funniest memes originated somewhere in the chans. It became kind of fun watching memes go through a life cycle, through image hosting services like imgur and then joke aggregation sites and reddit, then on through twitter and facebook and sometimes even real life. I saw an ad on TV recently (I was in a sports bar, sue me) that was basically a mashup of two oldmemes from back in that era.

(These days I have to hand it to twitter, a lot of good stuff originates there too.)

Somewhere along the line, the commitment of the various boards of the chans to shitposting and contrariness made them immune from public shame and questioners of the narrative.

While the rest of the world has become uptight, unfunny, and unfailingly Correct, the denizens of /pol/ solve real-world puzzles and make a game out of trying to make the most offensive comment possible. In the process, they continue to make funny, effective memes and are responsible for opening a lot of peoples’ eyes to the truth.

They’ve even withstood various attempts to infiltrate, astroturf, and otherwise corrupt the operations there.

If you had asked me 10 or 12 years ago if I ever thought that the chans would be doing the Lord’s work, I would have laughed at you. But I think about someone who was into gore back in the day, and wonder if that experience hardened their emotional exoskeleton enough that they could investigate all the pedophilia and sex trafficking rumors going around, and I can’t help but be grateful.

At the end of the day, in a free market, the truth will win. /pol/ is a testament to that.

Long live /pol/.

Image of the week: Constitutional crisis edition

It is known that the left can’t meme.

But it is extra funny when a meme hits home so hard that the left is actively doing damage control.

It’s photoshop, people. We all know that.

Another thing we all know is that no matter what you claim, you would repeal the 2nd Amendment if you could.

So this image tells the truth, even though it’s just a meme.

Managing expectations

It occurred to me this week that so much of negotiation and persuasion is simply managing expectations.

“You’ll probably hate this,” I say, knowing that you probably will but you also want a good working relationship with me and will therefore try to like it.

“Faculty tend to react in a certain way to this type of invitation,” I say, so I use my estimate of that way to calculate likely attendees.

When those predictions play out, you’ve built up even more positive-leaning expectations.

It’s a good cycle to have. Carve out some positive (or negative, depending) space for yourself theoretically, then over deliver.

Boom, instant reputation.

Older posts Newer posts

© 2024 Batfort

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑