Batfort

Style reveals substance

Month: October 2018 (page 1 of 4)

Tomorrow is November

It’s a potpourri post since I can’t hold one coherent thought in my head tonight. It’s Halloween. I drank a Gin Pellegrino and talked with a Baptist preacher. There are precisely zero trick-or-treaters in my neighborhood.

» October went so quickly that I’m kind of reeling in shock—especially because it doesn’t feel like I did anything. That’s not strictly true (I unpacked most of my new house and had minor oral surgery done) but it feels that way and that is the worst part.

» I’m frustrated that I can’t find a good source of historical “day book” syntax and prompts that can scaffold posts like these when I am scraping the bottom of the barrel for content. That’s probably silly of me, since our modern propensity toward journaling is made possible, in part, because of our limitless (perceptually-speaking) resources, so most early-modern daybookery was probably things like “The accounts for my estate” and “Birth records of the Hockney family tree.”

» I’m ALSO frustrated that some days I have ideas for 20 different blog posts in my head, and other day’s it’s like a flock of butterflies in there. Nothing. One of my greatest strengths is my Extraverted Intuition, but it’s also one of my greatest weaknesses. It rains hard, but the aqueducts that could translate that rain into long-term stability don’t always function well.

» In other news, I started thinking about promoting this blog today. Terrifying.

» The manager of the meat department at my local food co-op and I had a talk today about custom sausages. Considering that I added sausages back to my diet last weekend to a delicious outcome, I’m interested.

» EXO teaser right on schedule:

My FERPA COMPLIANCE OFFICER costume

As you know, I work in higher ed.

As you may NOT know, I like dressing up on Halloween. I especially like wearing weird costumes that are mostly inside jokes with myself.

One Halloween, I wore a blonde wig and dressed up like old-school Taylor Swift, with a country dress and shoes that didn’t quite go. I hacked my work badge so that my name was No, it’s Becky.

Another Halloween, when I was working with a bunch science PhDs, I decided to dress as one of them. I scavenged a lab coat and a pipette and lab goggles. From afar, people assumed I was a student.

This Halloween, we’re going deep into “Nobody will get this” territory. So deep, in fact, that my costume is of something that doesn’t actually exist.

It doesn’t exist, but perhaps it should.

Yay, duct tape

Behold, the FERPA Compliance Officer.

I also have a matching cop hat, aviator sunglasses, and badge. I was going to wear a fake mustache but honestly at this point I think it would be overkill.

For those of you who don’t work in academia, FERPA is the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974. It “protects” the privacy of student records. If you’ve ever tried to call a university on behalf of a family member, it’s why you can’t do anything for them without a signed release.

Unlike HIPAA, which has a robust policing mechanism and serious consequences if it’s breached, FERPA is basically just a piece of paper. I’ve never heard of anyone getting in trouble for failing to follow FERPA law. FERPA is one of those things that’s used to keep outsiders out (like a mom calling to check on her kid’s grade when she’s paying the tuition bill) but to forge relationships with people who can exploit data in the name of “university business.” Because if it’s need-to-know, it’s not a breach.

If FERPA had an Office of Compliance, it would focus on low-level customer service mistakes and faculty screw ups. Like all Federal agencies, it would turn a blind eye to the systemic privacy violations that go along with things like data mining.

Because a FERPA Compliance Officer is such an absurd idea, I figured this mythical branch of law enforcement would make a great Halloween costume. Basically if a Halloween costume idea doesn’t make me laugh until I can’t breathe, I’m not interested.

I’ve been hanging on to this idea for years, and its about to make its debut.

I can’t wait.

Another day, another alt-right hitpiece (now with pictures)

There was an article posted on Politico today: Trump’s Culture Warriors Go Home. It’s the same article we’ve all read a million times before: a seemingly-even toned  piece of writing that simply describes a phenomenon, and never ever ever tries to influence you not even a little bit of how to feel about it.

Factually, it’s mostly true:

Loosely lumped together as the celebrities of the “alt-right”—a label most of them have since disavowed—they hailed from different corners of the web and professed different views, but they were united by a shared disdain for progressives and establishment Republicans, and a shared faith that the disruptive outsider named Donald Trump could usher in the change they believed America needed.

Sure. If you’re going to lump Milo and Mike Cernovich together with Richard Spencer, this is how you would describe the group. It’s clear later in the article that the author understands the animosity between the two factions, but doesn’t care. They’re all equally bad, equally alt-right.

There’s been a lot of kerfuffle lately about how words matter. But you know what else matters? Word choice. Words and phrases that color how you experience the story in your mind.

Words like these:

  • Cernovich was there to vent
  • Cernovich complained
  • Cernovich griped
  • Fringe web firebrands
  • Fake news and conspiracy theories
  • Plotting a move to an undisclosed location
  • He tweeted glumly
  • Riding the president’s coattails into a hostile capital with dreams of revolution
  • Culture warriors
  • Motley band of online fans
  • A livestream rant
  • Grandiose vision of cultural revolution

There’s more, but I’m bored. Another disingenuous media piece that is entirely wrong even though it is mostly factually correct. It’s designed to paint its subject in the worst possible light without actually saying anything untrue.

For instance, take this choice paragraph, dropped after a passage that is clearly designed to make Milo look desperate.

In response to questions from Politico Magazine for this story, Yiannopoulos responded only, “Go fuck yourself,” via text message.

I’d wager to guess that Milo’s response has more to do with DON’T TALK TO THE MEDIA than anything (it’s a common occurrence on his Instagram), and yet it’s used as evidence for the narrative that “Milo is out of control.”

This is most evidence in the illustrations that were commissioned to accompany the article. What’s the best way to portray patriotism, yet make it weird and threatening? Go with a red, white, and blue color palette but change the white to yellow. That gives both the in-your-face punch of a the primary triad while also subverting a familiar trope into something that makes human beings look like sick, IRL versions of The Simpsons.

The opening illustration basically portrays an apocalypse. Perhaps this is what leftists envision when they think back to election day? If they were even aware of any of these people back then. I feel like they’ve been “elevated” by the media to the status of post-hoc boogeymen more than anything. If they were serious about talking about people who were active during the campaign, the would also mention people like Baked Alaska and Pax Dickinson.

Anyway, the illustration. Richard Spencer has been given a briefcase with a cross on it, despite him being about the farthest thing from Christian as I can think of. Milo is given a Napoleon complex. Chuck C Johnson is…having a heart attack? And Mike, of course, has been given pizza in reference to #pizzagate—the media’s favorite conspiracy to debunk because their version of it was designed to be ridiculous and completely debunkable. I also note the inclusion of a “Trump that Bitch” campaign sign, which was never a thing.

Even if you don’t read the article, this illustration shows you what you’re supposed to see, the WASTELAND of TRUMP SUPPORTERS in a SEA OF TRASH. This is not the type of illustration you give to a balanced, nuanced piece of writing.

The portraits don’t get any better. Here’s the one of Mike Cernovich.

This illustration kinda makes you sick when you look at it, and that is the whole point. The blue/yellow gradient is an inspired touch, as are the tattered campaign flags. And there’s more pizza. Stacks of MAGA hats crossed out tryin to make him look like some kind of obsessive who hates MAGA with a passion. For the record, Mike Cernovich has responded to this article with love.

These kinds of articles (hitpieces, really) are tiring. They’re really not worth it to respond to the way that I have with this post, but sometimes the bald, mean-spirited rhetoric of the media just gets to me. I feel compelled to point out all of the ways that they color the facts, literally and figuratively.

There is no possible way to read the original article and give any one of the subjects in it the benefit of the doubt. All the room that a good journalist might have left in for the reader’s objective consideration of the facts has been squeezed out by rhetorical tricks and malice.

 

I can see exactly what they’re doing, and I hope that this post will help you to see it, too.

The Reader: Font choice is super-important and fashion designers are trolls

Hello friends,

I love the end of October; in my part of the world, it’s finally starting to feel like fall. This weekend I’ve been raking leaves and curled up in front of my fireplace. I’ve discovered a renewed interest in practical wisdom—that only comes from doing something—so as I do an activity I ask myself “what am I teaching myself with this?” Am I teaching myself to be passive and accept something that someone else is offering to me? Or am I pushing myself to do and to accomplish things for myself?

It’s a revealing question.


 

» Why Are We Still Teaching Reading the Wrong Way? Phonics, as it turns out, teaches kids how words are an physical manifestation of an abstract system. Teaching “whole language” is the equivalent of “do what I tell you and don’t ask questions,” rather than giving children the tools to think and discover for themselves.

while you’re likely to find some phonics lessons in a balanced-literacy classroom, you’re also likely to find a lot of other practices rooted in the idea that children learn to read by reading rather than by direct instruction in the relationship between sounds and letters. For example, teachers will give young children books that contain words with letter patterns the children haven’t yet been taught. You’ll see alphabetical “word walls” that rest on the idea that learning to read is a visual memory process rather than a process of understanding how letters represent sounds. You’ll hear teachers telling kids to guess at words they don’t know based on context and pictures rather than systematically teaching children how to decode.

» Someone is already looking at MBTI type and personal style, and I love it. The site is more more sales-oriented than a thorough examination, but it’s still something to go off rather than simply expanding through first principles.

» In grantland, the wrong font can mean certain death. This PI’s grant got rejected because of byzantine font rules in the VA’s grant review system. Given the sheer volume of grant submissions to go through, I can understand why something as arbitrary as formatting is used to disqualify applications—just to narrow down the field.

» This one has been making the rounds: Instagram Has a Massive Harassment Problem.

But Instagram’s current reporting pathway doesn’t allow users to explain exactly why something is offensive, leaving moderators to guess.

“There could be all sorts of things that the user understands that the moderator doesn’t,” Andy said. “So many of my co-workers are old, people who did not grow up thinking like anything like this would ever happen. They got hired because their résumé says, ‘I have a Facebook account,’ but you need a Ph.D. in 4chan slang sometimes, and stuff that’s specific to Instagram, in order to understand what someone means when they post something. We just have no context about the stuff that we get related to harassment, and it makes it a lot harder to interpret who is attacking.”

» I remain interested in Wim Hof breathing.

» Ironic fashion is nothing new (and never will be while premium fashion trolls like Marc Jacobs and Karl Lagerfeld are still around).

» Everything I knew about reading was wrong—a recap of Naval Ravikant’s approach to reading. I’ve heard a lot about this guy on Twitter, so I listened to the podcast that was the origin of this list. He had some interesting things to say, but he’s not the luminary I was expecting. I will continue to be mildly interested.

» The Builders of Ocean Grove had a Higher Calling

» The Man Who Pioneered Food Safety

» Coming to terms with six years in science: obsession, isolation, and moments of wonder. This is a frank essay about the realities of getting a PhD in science, from someone who made it through. If you are interested in pursuing a PhD at all, read this.

» I’m considering chinoiserie wallpaper for my bedroom.

» FBI Admits It Used Multiple Spies To Infiltrate Trump Campaign

 

 

Book covers of politics and social sciences bestsellers

I’ve noticed that right-leaning book covers differ drastically from left-leaning book covers, and I’m trying to figure out why. To get started, I decided to look at Amazon’s list of Best Sellers in Politics & Social Sciences  this afternoon. Originally I started in the Political Philosophy subcategory, but instead I decided to go up a level to the main category.

That proved to be an interesting decision, because it changes the mix drastically. The only books that are actually about politics in the top five are right-leaning. The others are self-help books.

These are the first five actual books listen. I skipped extra editions and audiobooks—12 Rules for Life, Fear: Trump in the White House, and Sapiens.

FYI: I have read precisely zero of these books.

Girl, Wash Your Face: Stop Believing the Lies About Who You Are so You Can Become Who You Were Meant to Be

Author: Rachel Hollis
Publisher: Thomas Nelson (Harper Collins/News Corp)

“Lifestyle expert Rachel Hollis” somehow made it to the top of the Politics & Social Sciences category. Based on the other categories listed in its description, I’d guess that the publishers put it in as many categories as possible. I’m not sure how that works, but whatever.

I see that the handwriting trend is making its way to book covers. This on in particular makes sense with the tone and title of the book, so it’s appropriate. I like how they made the pop of red in the “#1 bestseller” bubble match her shoes—gives it a nice sense of completeness without being overly matchy, which would go counter to the message of the title. Not really sure what’s going on in that photo, but I think that’s the point.

Go crazy! Be wild! Do stuff! Put your book in a category that doesn’t really make sense!

The Coddling of the American Mind: How Good Intentions and Bad Ideas Are Setting Up a Generation for Failure

Authors: Greg Lukianoff, Jonathan Haidt
Publisher: Penguin Press (Bertelsmann/Pearson)

I would not be surprised to find an interview with the cover designer of this book and hear them saying “Yeah I did this cover in like 20 minutes.” It reminds me of something I would have turned in for a critique when I was a graphic design student when I had zero time to work on something and was working on it at 2 am the night before. The typography is self-consciously large without being bold, and unfortunately wordy. I’m not sure where to look, and I really don’t want to.

This cover is certainly not doing the book any favors, and from what I can tell of Haidt and Lukianoff, their ideas are worth far more than this.

 

Ship of Fools: How a Selfish Ruling Class Is Bringing America to the Brink of Revolution

Author: Tucker Carlson
Publisher: Free Press (Simon & Schuster/CBS)

The caricatures are fun. The rest of it is…not. This is criminal abuse of white space. The major elements are too crowded, yet the rest of the space is off balance and uncomfortable. The end result is not something that’s spacious and pleasing, but that gives one the anxiety of balancing a tower of elephants on a ball.

Is the boat supposed to be going over a waterfall? Are they going to crash into the red “NY Times Bestseller” bubble? How long did it take you to figure out that there was a subtitle? So many questions.

 

21 Rituals to Change Your Life: Daily Practices to Bring Greater Inner Peace and Happiness

Author: Theresa Cheung
Publisher: Watkins House (Penguin/Random House, Bertelsmann/Pearson)

Ahh, what a change in tone. This is the type of cover that tricks you into thinking that it’s good, until you start looking at the details. I’m not a fan of the leading, especially between “21” and “rituals to,” but I do like the polka-dot treatment. The colors are good, but I just noticed the…is that supposed to be texture? Like water stains or something?

Nitpicks aside, this is a balanced, classy-looking cover that would catch any Pinterester’s eye. (And I’m sure that’s their audience.)

 

Smarter Faster Better: The Transformative Power of Real Productivity

Author: Charles Duhigg
Publisher: Random House (Bertelsmann/Pearson)

This is fine, if a bit obnoxious. But that’s on purpose, so whatever.

Two thoughts:

  1. A book title that evokes a song satirizing the NPC lifestyle might not exactly be the best thing…? Radiohead’s “Fitter, Happier, More Productive” is 20 years old and yet I feel like it’s more relevant than ever. (And yet I myself am guilty of doing this exact thing.)
  2. This cover was obviously designed to compliment Duhigg’s other book.

 

After all of that—is there any conclusion we can draw about these book covers?

The political books (Ship of Fools, The Coddling of the American Mind) come across as less refined, like they’re still in the draft or concept stage. I have a hard time imagining how someone would think the Coddling cover would be effective, for one. Even the color red seems off. It’s too cool to be truly alarming. It’s a book cover that pulls its punches. It bothers me the most out of all of these, almost like someone wanted the book to fail.

The Girl, Wash Your Face cover is the most successful. It’s simple, yet communicates all that it needs to. There are no awkward text additions (like the Duhigg book) or weird line spacing (like the rituals book).

We won’t solve the right vs left book covers mystery in this post, most obviously because of the lack of explicitly left-leaning political books. Putting politics and social science together certainly blunts that impact, even though (today, at least) the right’s books are more popular.

Image of the Week: Hallomeme

Sometimes I crave Spaghetti-Os. This is weird for a few reasons.

  1. Who even thinks about Speaghetti-Os?
  2. It’s been over a year since I’ve eaten something that wasn’t meat, eggs, cheese, butter, or coffee, and I really don’t crave any of that stuff.
  3. Ew.

Yet still, the cravings are there. They don’t belong, but still pop out and say hi.

That’s kind of how I feel about this image:

Memes in real life.

Semi-obscure right wing memes in real life.

Semi-obscure right wing memes in real life themed for a holiday.

So wrong and yet so right.

 

I love the implicit sub-plot of this setup—it could lead toward its own horror movie. Or rather, long-form YouTube video.

 

 

Alternative Education (an unofficial list)

There’s a movement in higher ed about the “alt ac,” to help promote nonacademic careers to the PhD candidates who will listen before they hit the tenure-track job market and learn how bad their job prospects really are. It’s a runaway truck ramp for the implicit promises that the current faculty make to their trainees (while simultaneously saying “one only pursues a PhD out of passion, not out of hopes for a job afterward”).

I wised up to that game.

What I’m interested in is alternative education, “alt ed.” The boundless cradle of information that is the internet has birthed many different alternatives to the “traditional” American educational structure. As someone who sees first-hand every single day into the depths of the scam that is the modern university system, I’m interested in encouraging this sort of thing.

To do that, I’m going to start documenting interesting companies, orgs, and non-profits that I find. This is not a vetted list of trusted places to get an education. I have no idea if any of things are actually good. I’m just compiling a list.

Experience Institute

“Experience is for everyone. And we believe learning through experience leads to better work, better careers, and better lives.”

It’s very much cathedral-approved, but seems to have good intentions. The Casey Neistat of education?

Runchero University

Kevin Runner made a bunch of money correcting addresses in Banner (that’s the software that 75% of universities run on). Now he’s building a university with a “commitment to environmental sustainability, agricultural innovation and a healthy, thriving local community.” 

It’s a little hipstery, but I’m listening.

Colleges that don’t take federal money

MIT OpenCourseWare

You can get an entire education from MIT online for free. Proving that you know all the stuff is, of course, a little more difficult BUT if your goal is to learn, get at it.

MOOCs

 

TO BE CONTINUED

Bite-size

» I’ve been ruminating on the NPC meme. If you pay attention in this world, you’ve seen it before. It’s nothing new. If you’ve ever tried to do online dating, you’ve seen it. If you’ve ever worked customer service and known the exact conversation you’d have with someone before they even open your mouth, you’ve seen it. I recently moved, yet I see near carbon-copies of people that I knew in my last living environment.

Today I’m wondering if one of the hallmarks of an NPC is the inability to conceive of a way of thinking outside of oneself. Not just the ability to entertain the idea as a “thought experiment,” which most people can and will, but actively cultivating and using other people’s way of doing things to everyone’s better advantage. I feel like many of the people I talk to come from a “but why would you do it that way?” perspective, like any other way of tacking a problem is completely alien and therefore wrong.

I think this is closely related to solipsism.

 

» Speaking of solipsism, this type of thinking may be why the fashion industry is so insufferable.

Coco Chanel, a winter, once said that “Women think of all colors except the absence of color. I have said that black has it all. White too. Their beauty is absolute. It is the perfect harmony” – and thousands of editorials ever after never dared to question her. Similarly, a famous Australian fashion editor, also probably a winter, insists that her family all wear white on Christmas Day (which may indeed be a great foil for her, but mightn’t do much for a Soft Summer cousin or Autumn in-law.) A lot of fashion gurus seem to be winters, come to think of it, and perhaps this projection and marketing of personal bests as universal truths is a key point to understanding the industry as a whole.

In other words, people want rules and “universal truths” instead of thinking for themselves and standing on their own two feet. That goes double for fashion people.

Anyway, in my drugged-up, post (minor) surgery state I’ve decided that the absolute best way to spend my time is to do a deep dive into Personal Color Analysis and revisit, once again, the question of “If I’m a Soft Summer why do I look so good in olive green?” Seriously. The 12-step, more nuanced version of the “seasons” color palette makes a lot of sense, but I still can’t really figure out where I fit. I have a lot of characteristics of a “soft,” but have more contrast than the typical Soft Summer palette. I don’t do pastels, but feel at home in jewel tones. Yesterday I thought I could perhaps be a Dark or Deep Autumn, but I’ve never considered myself particularly warm-toned.

My skin has yellow undertones with pink overtones. My eyes are hazel and grey. I prefer wearing warmed-up cool tones (olive green, plum) and cooled-down warm tones (burgundy, brown). Basically I am very confused.

It doesn’t really matter if I fit in a category of someone else’s color system, as long as I find colors to wear that I like, that harmonize with me, and that project an image that helps me to succeed in this world. But I, like the people I grumbled about three paragraphs above, simply seek a set of rules and universal truths that will make me feel better about myself and my place in the universe.

I just talked myself into and out of a hole in the span of a few paragraphs. That is kind of weird.

 

» Speaking of weird, or maybe just speaking of drugs, WHY DO PEOPLE LIKE THIS STUFF? I do not understand the appeal of being high, aside from the obvious appeal of not being in pain. Especially the type of high that comes from drugs, which is this shallow chemically kind of mind/body change. Maybe it’s because of my extensive experience which I wrote about yesterday, but there is a huge difference between a shallow drug-induced change in your body, and a real, lasting change that you initiated yourself. Energy from caffeine does not equal energy from a full night of sleep. It’s the energy equivalent of fake news.

There are so many other ways to change your state of mind that require little to no effort or money and which have very few side effects or downsides if you get addicted. Like sprinting. Or cream sauce.

Try one of those things before you try drugs, kids.

Why I decided to get serious about my health

A friend of mine recently asked me to write a distilled version of my journey to health (boy that sounds hokey). My health journey. The long and arduous road that I took to finally not being at the mercy of any random doctor.

Also know as one of the best things I’ve done with my life.

I figured I’d try out a version here. We’ve talked enough about my recent health developments that you could use some backstory.

I was diagnosed with Crohn’s disease when I was six years old. That’s not very old, in the scheme of things, especially when you consider that most people are diagnosed with Crohn’s disease when they are more like 18 years old.

This doesn’t sound like a problem, but it does complicate things. For one, there are fewer pediatric gastroenterologists who know anything about small children with the disease. And two, there are a lot fewer resources from which to learn anything, especially if you’re a parent whose child now has an uncurable disease.

And what does one do when thrust into this situation? One listens to the doctor, of course. And really, why shouldn’t you? They’ve been trained to handle this, they have mountains of evidence and papers on their side, and they have An Answer held out to you on a silver platter.

This particular answer was Prednisone. I was prescribed a 60 mg dose of Prednisone as a six year old child. 60mg!! I was prescribed 90 mg when I had pneumonia as an ADULT. Can you imagine what that does to a child? Reader, I hallucinated. Practically crawled out of my skin.

Perhaps that has something to do with my utter disinterest in psychedelic drugs as an adult.

Anyway, my parents and I muddled our way through my childhood and early teen years. We saw specialists at the children’s hospital, consulted dietitians, went to Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation of America-sponsored seminars, but I ended up “graduating” from my pediatric gastroenterologist to an adult gastro at age 13.

That was the immunosuppressant era. My immune system would be suppressed for the next 16 years. I took my first imuran at 13 and did my last Remicade at 29, so…yeah. That’s a long time to be without an immune system.

For the record, I don’t recommend it.

However, getting immune suppressed allowed me to finish high school like a normal person and go on to college without worry about my health all the time. I could get away with eating like trash, so I did. My last year, I’m pretty sure 75% of my diet consisted of Cheez-its and chocolate that were smuggled into the computer lab.

In grad school, though, I had this feeling that something would have to change. I was tired of getting IV infusions all the time, and of being worried about insurance costs. It got worse when I graduated and started supporting myself—wiping out my entire savings to cover one infusion before the subsidy kicked in, taking the first job I was offered because it had stellar employer-sponsored coverage.

Insurance wasn’t what made me change my life, but it definitely provided incentive.

At one point, when I was doing a new consult with a naturopath, I told him that it was my goal to get off of Remicade, the IV immunosuppressant I was on at the time. And then it just slipped out: I wanted to get off insurance, too.

“Oh, no, that’ll never happen,” the doctor said. (He wasn’t my doctor for very long, tbh.)

Frankly, what I meant was that I didn’t want to be dependent on insurance, or owned by insurance. I wanted to get to a place where I could survive without insurance if I had to. At that point, it seemed like a complete impossibility. I stopped thinking about it.

What I did think about was my diet. I tried all sorts of approaches: the Specific Carbohydrate Diet, IgG/IgE allergen testing with a rotational diet, paleo (sometimes with the 80/20 stipulation), paleo autoimmune, low-FODMAP, and eventually all of them put together.

Doing work on my diet meant that I needed some expert help, which is why I had started seeing naturopaths. I started to research more than just diet, and strongly suspected I had Small Intestine Bacterial Overgrowth (SIBO). When my normal gastroenterologist just shrugged off my questions, I basically walked away from the MDs straight into the arms of the NDs.

From there, I tackled SIBO head on and started the (painful) process of ridding myself of 16 years’ worth of built-up bacteria. It was not a fun couple of years, but that work had to be done.

I quit all but one of my prescription drugs, and lived a normal life for a while.

But let me tell you something about bacteria colonies—they don’t like to die. They will craftily devise plans to NOT DIE. So you must fight them, aggressively.

Somewhere in the middle of trying the keto diet, almost completely losing control of my bowels, and still struggling to rid myself of bacteria, I learned that it was okay to only eat meat.

I cannot describe to you the depths of RELIEF that I felt those first few weeks as a pure carnivore.

No more angst about vegetables—which to eat and how to prepare them, and how much fiber is enough, and if I try this new thing how might my body react and in what proximity to a toilet do I have to hover for the next several hours?—all of that, gone.

Carnivory was not the 100% answer. I did not magically heal overnight.

I’m still healing, still having less-than-stellar bowel movements, still struggling with bacteria.

But my eczema has decreased to almost nil. I have control over my bowels again. When I’m rested, and not stressed, things almost return to normal. I have the confidence to live my life, and I know that things are heading in the right direction. I can feel it in my bones, and in the energy I have that I’ve never had before.

There are still things I’m tweaking. I need to learn how to reduce my overall stress levels and sleep more. Not everything is diet.

My health is not perfect yet, but I’m finally in a place where I don’t worry about insurance. I don’t have to. All my treatments are food or they’re completely free.

I have achieved that impossible goal.

Literally just a placeholder

Honestly, I’m just hanging on by Tylenol and Youtube right now, so I’m going to post this old-school (can you say that for a group that’s only like 2 years old?) photo of NCT 127 and call it a night.

I love how the Firetruck concept combined 70s-punk with the 90s-stray kid aesthetic. (Or is it early 2000s? I need photoreferences.)

Anyway, this look was so WEIRD.

I like weird.

Older posts

© 2024 Batfort

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑