Batfort

Style reveals substance

Tag: backwards book review

Backward Book Review: Dragonsinger by Anne McCaffrey

Backward Book Reviews are where I write what I remember about a book I read in the past, and then read the book again. There will probably be spoilers.

I have an itch to read Dragonsinger again, for the umpteenth time. This book, along with Lucy Maud Montgomery’s Emily series, was probably one of the most influential books on my childhood self.

This is a short book, a coming-of-age misfit teenager book, a book about pulling a backwards culture into the light. About abolishing bad traditions and revelling in new ones. (Although I kind of always understood how those traditions had come to be, and, as a child of staunchly Protestant parents. how we could reform them.)

It’s also a book about mini-dragons (fire lizards) and music, about a highly creative person among normies, about a girl who goes to wizard school and becomes the best in her craft. Sorry, music school.

This book is basically the female equivalent to A Wizard of Earthsea, which is also one of my most treasured favorites.

Menolly is an underappreciated prodigy. She is the darling of the staff at school. She had a physical injury that she had to overcome. She is basically a fantasy version of me, a character that I both related to and wanted to be.

Although being the darling of teachers in the public school system is not the magic I was dreaming of. (HA!) I knew it then, as I know now, that I wanted more out of life than what gets doled out by our broken modern institutions.

I loved the sci-fi/medieval aesthetics of the whole Pern series–the dragonriders, the thread that would fall from the sky and eat up all organic matter, the castle-based political structure. It was all very much like something I would make up myself, very simplistic and satisfying–but as I look back, not very realistic.

Dragonsinger was not a book about realism, though. It was a book about inspiration, about the power of will, more like a metaphor or a song than an accurate depiction of a political system or thriving economy.

You know, it reminds me of how some people, usually Introverted Feeling types, view how the world works. Everything is great an thematic and the details just happen somehow. It works when you’re 12. I’ve grown up a lot since then, so we’ll see if it works again.

Regardless, I’m excited to read this book. I need something easy and inspiring to read, to help me shift back into an “anything is possible” mindset.

Although when I’m finished I suspect that I’ll want a firelizard as a pet again, to wrap its tail around my forearm and sing.

Backwards Book Review: A Wrinkle in Time Pt II

Backwards book reviews are when I revisit a book that I’ve already read. Before I read the book, I’ll write down everything I can remember about it. Afterward, I’ll write up my thoughts and see how well my memories stacked up.

If you’d like to read what I remembered of A Wrinkle in Time before I read it again, read Part I of this backwards book review. There will probably be spoilers.

Pt II: The Aftermath

What a charming book! I completely forgot that for this (intuitive) (intelligent) girl, how utterly captivating the world of A Wrinkle in Time is. It’s also funny to note what stuck with me and what did not. Memory can be a fickle creature (if you rely on it as a strictly historical record).

First of all, I must rectify the misspellings in the Backwards part of this review. It’s Madeleine L’Engle and the Murry family. That’s what I get from doing this from memory.

What I got wrong

  • The snake. While the tree (it was really an apple orchard) and the stone fence did appear in the story, the snake did not. I think I was confusing Wrinkle with A Wind in the Door again.
  • “I think at certain points Charles Wallace bogs them down because he’s only like 6 years old or something”. Fact check: while it’s true that Charles Wallace is only like 6 years old, that wasn’t his age that was the issue. It’s only a major plot point!
  • This isn’t wrong, per se, but I completely missed the “growing up” themes of the book, that dovetail perfectly with the overt message about the importance of free will. Meg’s character development hinges on her moving from counting on someone else to save her, to reluctantly shouldering the burden that only she can bear. Interesting that I did not remember this part at all, but that it stuck out at me so obviously this time. Perhaps it’s because I’ve now gone through that transition that I can see it more clearly.

What I got right

  • 2D planet. They did indeed go to a 2D planet, and I still love thinking about how it would work. I did, however, fail to remember the other interesting planets that they visited.
  • The theme of humanity vs tyranny, and the importance of making decisions for yourself.
  • The secondary and tertiary characters: Mrs Who, Mrs Which, and Mrs Whatsit, Meg’s mother and twin brothers.

Thoughts from the second round

This book is a simple fantasy-adventure story that dramatizes really important ideas. The edition I read has a little interview with MLE in the back, and she says that she wrote this book after reading the theory of general relativity–she wanted to explore some of the concepts in it. I quite like how she did that (caution: I haven’t read that yet) in a way that makes sense, but also in a way that incorporates it into the fabric of the greater universe. By that I mean, God is still sovereign, and there are many different variations of “creation” in that each planet has a unique sense of time and terrain that is reflected in its inhabitants.

It’s a fun adventure of ideas – the fantasy elements are firmly rooted in real life but explored to almost absurd extremes and baked into every element of the plot. This isn’t a veneer of fantasy, this is the real thing. Books like this are the kind that a father wouldn’t mind reading to his child at night.

Reading this book now, in the era of fake news, in the era where children are “elected” to go to college and come out just another rubberstamped BS or BA, in the era where CIA projects may well cause the end of the world, it feels so prescient. I feel like I can walk out of my house and feel the throbbing thrum of the mighty villainous brain at the center of the book. The themes, of choosing for yourself over letting someone choose for you, of choosing to make those difficult decisions that leave you with skin in the game (tbd), of realizing that you can’t rely on someone else to save you (or the day), these themes are essential to us if we endeavor to live for ourselves.

As far as mechanics go, the plot ends quite abruptly. As a reader, I was a little let down as there was very little resolution from all the family-level worries that undergird the story. I wanted some discussion from the Murry family about what went on and what it means. I wanted to know more about the happy reunion between Mr. Murry and his family. But as an aspiring writer, I appreciated the ending, however abrupt it may be. Everything was wrapped up, and out. There may be discussion, but it’ll be in the slow build of the next book. I suppose I recognize some of my own habits in the rhythm of the book: a long slow introduction and then a lot of activity before abruptly dropping to stillness again.

Overall

I loved this book when I was twelve and I enjoyed it as an adult as well. I won’t say that I “loved” it because it didn’t grab me as much as it did when I was the same age as the heroine. It was worth the read, both for the flights of fancy and the serious message.

Would read again.

Backwards Book Review: A Wrinkle in Time

Backwards book reviews are when I revisit a book that I’ve already read. Before I read the book, I’ll write down everything I can remember about it. Afterward, I’ll write up my thoughts and see how well my memories stacked up.

A Wrinkle in Time is one of those major books in my childhood. I was probably 11 or 12 when I first read it, and it absolutely captivated me with its rich storytelling, flights of fantasy, and yet its focus on intelligence and rationality. After Wrinkle, I read nearly every Madeline L’Engle book I could get my hands on (with the exception of A House Like a Lotus which I put down because it was too mature for me at the time) throughout middle school until I reached Walking on Water in high school. Walking on Water: Reflections on Faith and Art remains an influential book on me to this day. The sequel to WrinkleA Wind in the Door, is possibly more influential, but that’s another matter for another day.

Let’s see what I can remember about  A Wrinkle in Time. And how much I can keep Wrinkle separate from Wind.

Wrinkle is the story of Meg Murray, her brother Charles Wallace, and I think her friend Calvin O’Keefe saving the world from what current me would identify as totalitarianism. On a stormy night, she is visited by an omen (Louise the snake) out by an old gnarled tree by a stone fence, and soon meets the three witches–Mrs Who, Which, and Whatsit–who teach the kids how to tesseract and take them on a goose chase through the universe. There is something wrong with the universe that they have to find and fix, but they don’t know what it is at first. (Honestly, that sounds to me like a heavily intuitive way to go about things, but I’ve been thinking a lot about intuition lately. It would not surprise me if MLE wrote highly intuitive books, considering her propensity to write about families of highly intelligent people.) I think the problem has something to do with their father? Maybe he’s kidnapped or something.

The witches try to take them to a 2D planet, where their 3D forms are squished and where they cannot survive. Eventually, they end up on what the current version of me would call Totalitarian Planet, where all the houses are the same and the yards are the same and the kids play the same games and even the balls bounce in unison. UGH. This is ground zero, where the wrongness is, and they find that the planet is ruled by what is basically a disembodied brain, demanding that everything on the planet bend to its rule, enforced dramatically by a rhythm. To avoid getting trapped by this, the kids sing songs and nursery rhymes in different time signatures. Somehow they save the day.

Then they end up at home, which is comforting and full of family, including their mother and the twin brothers Sandy and Dennys (I think–it was a strange name to me), with a little bit more affection for their prescient snake.

Thematically speaking, it was a story about not letting someone or something else rule your life, and I remember MLE talking in an interview about originally making the villain a disembodied heart, but that she ended up thinking that a disembodied brain would be basically more of a tyrant. I’m not sure if I agree with her, but it is true that strictness without the temperance of love or mercy is never the way to go.

The characters in the book are full of creativity and ingenuity, are committed to the truth, and are patient. I think at certain points Charles Wallace bogs them down because he’s only like 6 years old or something, but they manage to make it work without sacrificing him. The power of humanity over tyranny.

I always loved how MLE wove together an idealized New England academic family with a highly imaginative yet totally plausible fantasy elements. So many of the ideas that MLE explores seem to test the boundaries of reality, but I feel like the events in her novels–this series especially–were simply dramatized versions of what might actually be already happening in the world.

Like Jordan B Peterson takes everyday tasks and draws out their cosmic significance, MLE takes the world that we live in and heightens it to a point where you can see the spiritual battles taking place. I could tell you the battlefield for A Wind in the Door, but I’ll have to save that for my review on that book. Wrinkle escapes me, although I may have already hit on it: totalitarianism and the utter importance of free will.

© 2024 Batfort

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑